AdvertiseDonate
LatestFilmmaker Returns to Columbia for New Documentary on Campus Politics
Sat, Nov 7, 2026Los AngelesNew YorkChicagoHoustonPhoenixPhiladelphiaSan FranciscoSeattleAtlantaBoston
Worldwide Herald · 40 W 2nd St, 2nd Floor, Dayton, OH 45402
World · Cincinnati

Gillibrand sets price on ending Iran conflict: 100 votes

The New York senator outlines a legislative path to cap defense spending and force a vote on the war, betting on bipartisan support to bypass a presidential veto.

By Khalid Khalil ·

Illustration for: Gillibrand sets price on ending Iran conflict: 100 votes
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

One hundred votes. That is the arithmetic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York says Democrats need to end the war in Iran and hold the White House accountable. The number reflects the threshold for overriding a presidential veto, a mechanism Gillibrand believes is now within reach following the recent elections.

Gillibrand told NPR’s Morning Edition that the new Democratic majority in Congress must prioritize three goals: lowering consumer costs, restoring Medicaid coverage, and terminating the conflict with Iran. She specifically challenged President Donald Trump to veto a bipartisan bill designed to restore health insurance access, framing the legislative fight as a test of his willingness to govern with the opposition.

The senator linked the party’s election victories directly to the ongoing war, arguing that the conflict eroded public trust in Trump’s promise to avoid prolonged military engagements. She stated, “We have to end this war in Iran,” identifying the conflict as a primary driver of the shift in power.

While Trump acknowledged on Wednesday that the war contributed to Republican losses, Iranian officials continue to warn against renewed U.S. attacks. Gillibrand did not specify the exact legislative vehicle for ending the war, but she proposed a broader accountability package that includes banning stock trading for members of Congress and senior administration officials. She noted that Democrats could pursue both legislative reforms and oversight investigations simultaneously.

When asked about the possibility of a third impeachment, Gillibrand remained noncommittal. The new congressional leadership now holds increased investigative powers, but the path to forcing a ceasefire or a formal vote of no confidence remains undefined. The administration and the incoming Democratic caucus have yet to agree on the procedural steps required to break the current stalemate.

More World · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Worldwide Herald in your inboxThe latest from the cities that shape the country. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Worldwide Herald in your inboxThe latest from the cities that shape the country. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.